In one video, Archbishop Nosiglia said the church is not against new testing. This is completely unscientific. Colin, Shall I remind you again and again? Then we would have a wide variety of test results.
Best then to view the dating as a preliminary ranging shot. This has all been pretty much documented particularly by Gove. You and Hugh should both now be delighted that true additional scientific studies may in the not too distant future now be permitted.
5 Key Pieces of Evidence on the Shroud of Turin - Magis Center
Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Tell us what is the most important proof of the authenticity of the Holy Shroud and we will see. Indeed the answers, even with the modest degree of scatter around mean, were in my humble view remarkably consistent. Louis, You venture into the corridors of Vatican intrigue at your own risk.
But Oxford is heavily supported by the British S. Bernard says he is convinced that the Shroud is not related to Jesus because of what the scriptures say. Pictorial evidence dating from c.
Cardinal Ballestrero made it quite clear that his hands had been tied by the Vatican. The third was a multi-parametric mechanical test based on five different mechanical parameters linked to the voltage of the wire. The amazing Dr Kouznetsov. He also said his tests also supported earlier results claiming to have found traces of dust and pollen on that shroud that could only have come from the Holy Land.
- This flood of neutrons may have imprinted an X-ray-like image onto the linen burial cloth, say the researches.
- Is Atheism Inconsistent with the Scientific Method?
- You must agree, as an honest scientist, that the Shroud custodians essentially have shut down access to the Shroud for scientific research after the radiocarbon testing results were announced.
- But statistically speaking, one part of the sample is years older than the other.
- Ah, something that makes sense published in a real scientific journal.
The new test, by scientists at the University of Padua in northern Italy, used the same fibers from the tests but disputes the findings. It determined that the earlier results may have been skewed by contamination from fibers used to repair the cloth when it was damaged by fire in the Middle Ages, the British newspaper reported. It was used on the Mona Lisa with amazing results and properly executed is not invasive. There is nothing about the inconsistencies in the radiocarbon measurements that contradicts a medieval date, and plenty to refute a first century one.
The accuracy of any C date depends on the slope of the calibration graph, which, averaged out over the last three or four hundred years, is more or less flat. As you know, I have examined all your factors in detail, both on shroudstory and elsewhere, and concluded that none of them detract from the medieval date. My point though was not whether I am right and you are wrong about the Shroud, what does speed dating but on your pronouncement that your ideas are the only possible correct ones. The final decisions were made in a letter from the Vatican to the Archbishop of Turin who was given no discretion.
Dating The Shroud
Please read the rules before joining the discussion. Christianity portal Logic portal Science portal. There is an image and discussion of it in my book. Are you just aware the removal of such contaminants is either impossible or almost impossible? You venture into the corridors of Vatican intrigue at your own risk.
To obtain independent and replicable results, and to avoid conflict between the laboratories, it was decided to let all interested laboratories perform the tests at the same time. But there are questions that other religions have also left unanswered, but that is another story. Does anybody know if he added any further details to his account anywhere else?
5 Key Pieces of Evidence on the Shroud of Turin
Dear Hugh, you must have misinterpreted the sentence you quote. Thirdly both ends were made entirely of cotton. Some have proposed that it came from the body itself, or was generated by an event inside the tomb, pointing to a divine origin linked to the resurrection. So, yes, not surprisingly, the decision was made to restrict sampling to a corner region that pesky real world intruding yet again! Jesus asked you to read things with open eyes and open mind.
Carbon Date the Shroud Again Shroud of Turin Blog
This paper totally discredits the results of the radiocarbon dating as related to the entire Shroud. The best chance for non-intrusive carbon dating may have been lost. In relation to radiocarbon dating I would like to know your opinion on Christen, J. This website focuses on the latest dating challenges of the Shroud of Turin.
Who was dictating the terms in the game and what kind of game was it? Development of the image in the fumigation chamber can be monitored visually at intervals over minutes or hours until one has obtained optimum image intensity, and the least damage to linen fibres. He has however also acknowledged that the samples had been carefully cleaned with strong chemicals before testing.
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. Garbage sample provided garbage results. We should all be on the same page for that. In short, the ends justified the means. However, no plausible explanation has been offered for the source of the radiation.
This is getting somewhat tedious Max. The truth is the end we are all seeking and different paths can lead to the truth. They are commonly included in the Good Friday liturgy readings because of their aptness to the sufferings of Christ. An outer strip showing coloured filaments of uncertain origin was discarded.
The proposed changes to the Turin protocol sparked another heated debate among scientists, and the sampling procedure was postponed. Secondly in order to hold them together they were glued with a resin. Regarding the Vatican agreeing with theories, it claims no competence in scientific matters but has simply encouraged scientists to continue their research. Blood would have been applied after. However, dating an some weakening of fibres must be expected.
- Anyway I will continue with my own researches and hope for eventual publication of them to make my argument clear.
- Four of the greatest number of pollen grains found on the cloth are unique to Judea.
- That came from Father Rinaldi and others.
- Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin.
Perhaps the retesting of the remaining samples can be held at the same time that three other laboratories test samples from different parts of the Shroud. Contradictory results are common in science. Do we have any proof that Moses existed or about the Exodus? But it turned his measurements were actually wrong.
Radiocarbon Dating of the Turin Shroud New Evidence from Raw Data
Then in it was sampled for C dating which was plain stupidity. Your timing is impeccable and I pray your blog is widely accessed as it has been in the past. Cardinal Anastasio Ballestrero was forced into a situation for which he was not prepared, probably getting the wrong advice from Professor Luigi Gonella.